S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Condition
Msn4p	YGR248W	PubMed Puig S et al., Yeast, 2000 Jan 30;16(2):139-48	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Exponential-phase cells cultivated in YPD supplemented with 0.4% NaCl
		PubMed Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD + 0,5M NaCl
		PubMed Cameroni E et al., Cell Cycle, 2004 Apr;3(4):462-8	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,19 generations)
		PubMed Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1B	Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate)
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)
		PubMed Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	IMZ066	Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)
		PubMed Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	10 min shift to pH=8