Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Msn4p YDR074W PubMed external link Schmitt AP et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82Schmitt AP et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression Positive S288c Methylmethane sulfonate stress
PubMed external link Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD + 0,5M NaCl
PubMed external link Kandror O et al., Mol Cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81Kandror O et al., Mol Cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Cold stress; Cells cultivated for 24h at 0ºC in YP growth medium with galactose as carbon source
PubMed external link Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,08 generations)
PubMed external link Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A
PubMed external link Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1B Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate)
PubMed external link Berry DB et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7Berry DB et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD+0.7 M NaCl 45min
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD e 30-37.C heat shock 15min
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)
PubMed external link Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive IMZ066 Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)
PubMed external link Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Sake mash on day 5
PubMed external link Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 10 min shift to pH=8
PubMed external link Sadeh A et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2011 Sep;22(17):3127-38Sadeh A et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2011 Sep;22(17):3127-38 Indirect GFP - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c SC medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938 Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY5764 YPD 30.C
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator