Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Condition
Haa1p YNL160W PubMed external link Keller G et al., J Biol Chem, 2001 Oct 19;276(42):38697-702Keller G et al., J Biol Chem, 2001 Oct 19;276(42):38697-702 Direct DNA footprinting Positive CM66J Cells grown in SC medium before induction of pGAL1-HAA1 with 2% galactose
Direct DNA footprinting Positive CM66J Cells grown to log phase in SC medium
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive CM66J Cells grown to log phase in SC medium supplemented with 100 microM BCS or 100 microM CuSO4
PubMed external link Fernandes AR et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2005 Nov 11;337(1):95-103Fernandes AR et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2005 Nov 11;337(1):95-103 Indirect Western blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 20 mM propionic acid (45 min)
PubMed external link Mira NP et al., OMICS, 2010 Oct;14(5):587-601Mira NP et al., OMICS, 2010 Oct;14(5):587-601 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 Cells cultivated for 30 min in MM4 growth medium (pH 4.0) supplemented with 50 mM acetic acid
PubMed external link Tanaka K et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2012 Nov;78(22):8161-3Tanaka K et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2012 Nov;78(22):8161-3 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF overexpression (altered promoter sequence) Positive S288c logarithmically growing cells
PubMed external link Sugiyama M et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2014 Jun;80(11):3488-95Sugiyama M et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2014 Jun;80(11):3488-95 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF overexpression Positive BY4741 Strains incubated in YPD medium containing 4% lactic acid (pH 2.8) for 30 min
PubMed external link Sakihama Y et al., J Biosci Bioeng, 2015 Mar;119(3):297-302Sakihama Y et al., J Biosci Bioeng, 2015 Mar;119(3):297-302 Direct RT-PCR - wt vs mutant promoter sequence Positive S288c acetic acid
PubMed external link Swinnen S et al., Microb Cell Fact, 2017 Jan 9;16(1):7Swinnen S et al., Microb Cell Fact, 2017 Jan 9;16(1):7 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Growth in synthetic medium + 50 mM acetic acid (pH 4.5)
PubMed external link Palma M et al., BMC Genomics, 2017 Jan 13;18(1):75Palma M et al., BMC Genomics, 2017 Jan 13;18(1):75 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c log-phase growth; MM4 pH 4.0
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 60 mM acetic acid (1H)
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 60 mM acetic acid (2H)
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator