Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Condition
Gcn4p YEL009C PubMed external link Kleinschmidt M et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2005 Jun;273(5):382-93Kleinschmidt M et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2005 Jun;273(5):382-93 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 3-aminotriazole
PubMed external link Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive N/A Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
PubMed external link Moxley JF et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82Moxley JF et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YNB media
PubMed external link Staschke KA et al., J Biol Chem, 2010 May 28;285(22):16893-911Staschke KA et al., J Biol Chem, 2010 May 28;285(22):16893-911 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive EG328-1A RNA prepared from wt and DELTAgcn4 cells treated for 1 h with 10 mM 3-AT
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive EG328-1A RNA prepared from wt and DELTAgcn4 cells treated for 1 h with 200 nM Rapamycin
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive EG328-1A RNA prepared from wt and DELTAgcn4DELTAgln3 cells treated for 1 h with 10 mM 3-AT
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Fendt SM et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2010;():Fendt SM et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2010;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Uluisik I et al., PLoS One, 2011;6(11):e27772Uluisik I et al., PLoS One, 2011;6(11):e27772 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 20 mM boric acid for 1h
PubMed external link McIsaac RS et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2013 Feb 1;41(4):e57McIsaac RS et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2013 Feb 1;41(4):e57 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Walvekar AS et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Oct 24;29(26):3183-3200Walvekar AS et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Oct 24;29(26):3183-3200 Indirect RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant Positive CEN.PK RM (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% lactate) medium grown cells shifted to MM (0.17% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 0.5% ammonium sulfate, and 2% lactate) medium with methionine supplementation
PubMed external link Srinivasan R et al., PLoS Genet, 2020 Dec;16(12):e1009252Srinivasan R et al., PLoS Genet, 2020 Dec;16(12):e1009252 Indirect RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant Positive CEN.PK Cells cultured for 1h in MM medium (Yeast Nitrogen Base with glucose as a carbon source) + Met (2mM methionine)
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator