Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Cbf1p
|
YJL101C
|
PubMed
Dormer UH et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Oct 20;275(42):32611-6Dormer UH et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Oct 20;275(42):32611-6 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
SD medium |
PubMed
Wheeler GL et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Oct;46(2):545-56Wheeler GL et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Oct;46(2):545-56 |
N/A |
|
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Wheeler GL et al., J Biol Chem, 2003 Dec 12;278(50):49920-8Wheeler GL et al., J Biol Chem, 2003 Dec 12;278(50):49920-8 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
exposure to 1-chloro-2,4-dintrobenzene (CDNB) |
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Moxley JF et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82Moxley JF et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
BY4741 |
YNB media supplemented with 20 mg/L methionine |
PubMed
Lee TA et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2010 Feb 1;21(3):456-69Lee TA et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2010 Feb 1;21(3):456-69 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303 (met4::GAL-MET4 met30DELTA cbf1DELTA) |
Shift from YEP + 2% raffinose to YEP + 2-3% galactose |
PubMed
Lavoie H et al., PLoS Biol, 2010 Mar 9;8(3):e1000329Lavoie H et al., PLoS Biol, 2010 Mar 9;8(3):e1000329 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
YPD |
PubMed
Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
PubMed
Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
BY4741 |
YPD medium, 25.C |