Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Msn4p
|
YFL014W
|
PubMed
MartÃnez-Pastor MT et al., EMBO J, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35MartÃnez-Pastor MT et al., EMBO J, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
7% ethanol 20min |
PubMed
Schmitt AP et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82Schmitt AP et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
Methylmethane sulfonate stress |
PubMed
Smith A et al., EMBO J, 1998 Jul 1;17(13):3556-64Smith A et al., EMBO J, 1998 Jul 1;17(13):3556-64 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Rep M et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1999 Aug;19(8):5474-85Rep M et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1999 Aug;19(8):5474-85 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
0,7M NaCl 60min |
PubMed
Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-A |
Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C |
PubMed
Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0 |
PubMed
Amorós M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32Amorós M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Carbon source starvation |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Heat shock |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Osmotic stress |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
oxidative stress |
PubMed
Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
Indirect |
2D electrophoresis (WT vs msn2DELTAmsn4DELTAyap1DELTA triple mutant) |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
PubMed
Kandror O et al., Mol Cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81Kandror O et al., Mol Cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (2 generations) |
PubMed
Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min) |
PubMed
Melamed D et al., RNA, 2008 Jul;14(7):1337-51Melamed D et al., RNA, 2008 Jul;14(7):1337-51 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Osmotic stress; Exponential phase cells cultivated in YPD growth medium supplemented with1 M NaCl |
PubMed
Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress) |
PubMed
Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2 |
PubMed
Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
IMZ066 |
Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O) |
PubMed
Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Sake mash on day 5 |
PubMed
Sadeh A et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2011 Sep;22(17):3127-38Sadeh A et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2011 Sep;22(17):3127-38 |
Indirect |
GFP - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Diamide exposure-15min |
PubMed
Gutin J et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2015 Oct 7;11(10):829Gutin J et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2015 Oct 7;11(10):829 |
Indirect |
GFP - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Log phase |
PubMed
Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938 |
Direct |
ChIP-seq |
N/A |
BY5764 |
YPD 30.C |
PubMed
Bai C et al., PLoS One, 2020;15(8):e0237540Bai C et al., PLoS One, 2020;15(8):e0237540 |
Indirect |
BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF double mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
Indirect |
BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF quadruple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence |
Positive |
SP1 |
YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
Indirect |
BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF triple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs. TF double mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs. TF quadruple mutant |
Positive |
SP1 |
YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
PubMed
, , ;():, , ;(): |
Indirect |
flow cytometry - GFP fluorescence |
Positive |
W303 |
exposed to different QSMs for 45 min (quorum-sensing molecule), Selective Complete medium (SC, -His) |